Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Laboratory (PSL) pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika

Authors

  • Umi Zulaifah MAN 2 Rembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55719/jt.v8i2.957

Keywords:

Problem Solving Laboratory model, interest and learning outcomes

Abstract

This Classroom Action Research was conducted to determine the increase in interest and learning outcomes in Physics for class Data collection methods use observation, tests and practicum methods. Data analysis uses data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. In cycle 1 to cycle 2, the percentage of students whose interest was sometimes in all indicators continued to decline, namely the indicator of attention (35.14% - 27.02% - 2.70%), the indicator of interest (24.32% - 21.6%, - 0%), happiness indicator (29.72% -24.3%,- 0%). Student learning outcomes also increased after the action was taken. The percentage of students who have not completed has decreased from the initial condition (72.97% - 51.3% - 13.51%) for knowledge scores, (51.35% - 32.43% - 10.81%) for skills scores, a decrease in the predicate moderately (70.27% - 48.65% -10.81%) for affective value. The percentage of students who have completed has increased from cycle 1 to cycle 2 (27.03% - 48.6% - 86.49%) for knowledge scores, (48.65% - 67.57% - 89.19%) for skill scores and an increase in good and very good scores (29.73% - 51.35% - 89.19%) for affective scores. Thus the hypothesis of this research is proven. Actions are said to be successful if at least students have an interest percentage greater than 80% for all indicators. And the average score of students at the end of the cycle, the percentage who obtained a score above the KKM had reached greater than 80% for all knowledge, skills and affective scores. So, this PTK was declared to have succeeded in increasing interest and learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Shodiq. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Konsep Dasar, Teori dan Aplikasi. Semarang: PUSTAKA RIZKI PUTRA

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azizah dan S.S. Edie. 2014. Pendekatan Problem Solving Laboratory Untuk Meningkatkan Kreatifitas dan Hasil Belajar Peserta didik Kelas XI MA Al Asror Gunungpati. Unnes Physics Education Journal. Volume 3 (No. 3).

Chanifudin. 2016. Potensi Belajar Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Edukasi Islami Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Volume 05.

Ellianawati dan B. Subali. 2010. Penerapan Model Praktikum Sebagai Upaya Untuk Memperbaiki Kualitas Pelaksanaan Praktikum Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan fisika Indonesia. Volume 6.

Erita, Selvia. 2016. Beberapa Model, Pendekatan, Strategi, dan Metode dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.

Hadija, Siti, Nurjannah, dan Jusman Mansyur. 2015. Pengaruh Problem Solving Laboratory Menggunakan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Perubahan Konsep Fisika Peserta didik SMA Negeri 5 Palu. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT). Volume 3 (No. 3).

Hamalik, Oemar. 2007. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hanafy, Muh. Sain. 2014. Konsep Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan. Volume 17 (No. 1).

Hariyani, Fitri dkk. 2014. Pengaruh Model Problem Solving Laboratory Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta didik Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 2 Tanggul. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika.

Ince, Elif. 2018. An Overviw of Problem Solving Studies in Physics Education. Journal of Education and Learning. Volume 7 (No. 4).

Jamil, Abdul. 2018. Pengembangan Modul Fisika Materi Usaha dan Energi, Momentum, Impuls dan Tumbukan, dan Getaran harmonis Kelas X SMA/MA Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Skripsi Pendidikan Fisika UIN Walisongo.

Jati, Bambang Murdaka Eka. 2013. Pengantar Fisika 1. Yogyakarta: GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY PRESS.

Lestari, KE. 2015. Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Malik, Adam, Wahyuni Handayani, dan Rany Nuraini. 2015. Model Praktikum Problem Solving Laboratory untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahapeserta didik. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains.

Muhajir, Siti Nurdianti, dkk. 2015. Implementasi Model Problem Solving Laboratory untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahapeserta didik pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar II. SNIPS. ISBN: 978-602-19655-8-0.

Nurani, Dhara dan Rinawan Abadi. 2016. Fisika Peminatan Matematika dan Ilmu- ilmu Alam Kelas X Semester 2. Klaten: Intan Pariwara.

Nurmisanti, Yudi Kurniawan, dan Riski Muliyani. 2017. Identifikasi Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika p-ISSN 2477-5959. Volume 2 (No. 1).Pujianto, A., Nurjannah, dan I. W. Darmadi. 2013. Analisis Konsepsi Siswa Pada Konsep Kinematika Gerak Lurus. JPFT. Volume 1 (No. 1).

Raharja, Bagus, dkk. 2014. Panduan Belajar Fisika 2A SMA Kelas XI. Semarang: Penerbit Yudhistira.

Rahmania, Septi, Mieke Miarsyah, dan Nurmasari Sartono. 2018. The Difference Literacy ability of Student Having Field Independent and Field Dependent Cognitive Stile. FMIPA UNJ.

Rahmawati, Miffa Aulita. 2017. Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Fisika Peserta didik SMA UII Yogyakarta Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Laboratory [Skripsi]. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Ratnawati, Eris, Sri Rahayu, dan Prayitno. 2013. Pemahaman Hakikat Sains (NOS) Mahasiswa Tahun Ketiga Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rosa, Friska Octavia. 2017. Eksplorasi Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Memprediksi, Mengobservasi, Menjelaskan Ditinjau Dari Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. Vol. V (No. 2).

Rusman. 2010. Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rusman. 2013. Model-Model Pembelajaran Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Nana. 2005. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Zulaifah, U. (2023). Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Laboratory (PSL) pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Teladan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.55719/jt.v8i2.957