PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM SOLVING, STAD DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA, BIDANG STUDI EKONOMI

Penulis

  • Imam Makhfudi

Kata Kunci:

Learning Model, Motivation, Learning Outcomes

Abstrak

The research purpose is to know: (1) There is differences in economic learning results using Problem Solving, STAD in grade XII students SMAN I Lamongan, SMAN I kembangbahu. (2) The difference of economic learning outcomes between high motivation students and low motivation (3) There is interaction between the use of learning model and motivation to learn on the economic learning outcomes. Data were collected using a multiple-choice test and a rating scale motivation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics of anova two factors. The average score of student learning outcomes with Problem Solving, 83.84, STAD type 76.56, and average score of student learning outcomes highly motivated 83.07, low motivation  76.32. Hypothesis test  Anava (1) F count for 35.512, sig. 0.000 <0.05, There is  effect of learning outcomes students who were taught by Problem Solving and STAD type. (2) F count for 25.196, sig. 0.000 <0.05. There is effect of learning outcomes between students who are highly motivated and low motivated. (3) obtained F count of 9.164, sig. 0.003 <0.05, it can be concluded there is interaction between learning model and motivation to result learn. So the interaction between motivation and learning model influence together to increase student learning outcomes.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Aqib, Zainal. 2010. Propesionalisme Guru Dalam Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Insan Cendikia.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri dan Aswan Zain. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ghozali, Imam. 2007. Analisis Multivariat dengan SPSS. Semarang: BPFE Undip.

Kerami, Djati dan Cormentyna Sitanggang. 2003. Kamus Matematik. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Nurhadi dkk. 2008. Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning/CTL) Dan Penerapannya Dalam KBK.Edisi Revisi. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rooijakkers, Ad. 2011. Mengajar Dengan Sukses. Jakarta: PT Grasindo (Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia).

Rusman, 2013. Model-model pembelajaran, edisi 2. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Robert L. Ebel & David A. Frisbie ,(1986 : 29), dalam Irma Pujiati, Peningkatan Motivasi dan Ketuntasan Belajar Bahasa Inggris, JurnalIlmiah Kependidikan, Vol. I, No. 1 September (2008:77)

Sanjaya, Wina. 20014. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Stndard Proses Pendidkan. Cetakan 11. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Santyasa, I Wayan. 2007. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Makalah dalam Pelatihan PTK bagi Guru-Guru SMP dan SMA: Ttidak diterbitkan.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar baru.

Sugiyono. 2007. Statistika Untuk Penelitian . Jakarta: Rineka Utama.

Suherman, Erman. 2011. Sistem Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, Depdikbud.

Sukardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2010. Psikologi Belajar (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Diterbitkan

2018-05-28

Cara Mengutip

Makhfudi, I. (2018). PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM SOLVING, STAD DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA, BIDANG STUDI EKONOMI. Jurnal Teladan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 61–74. Diambil dari http://journal.unirow.ac.id/index.php/teladan/article/view/35